The perfect Git branching strategy can help your development team get more done with fewer mistakes and minimal code-loss catastrophes. However, a bad choice of branching strategy in Git can quickly frustrate your team members, slowing down development considerably in the process. The strategies below each have their strengths and
Git and GitHub can be tricky tools to master, but the better you get at using them, the more secure and consistent [https://blog.mergify.com/github-security-best-practices/] your coding work can become. Developers around the world leverage a number of Git and GitHub workflows to streamline their progress. Some of
Merging is at the core of the version control system Git's feature set. Git is a powerhouse for pushing code improvements and modifications from a local work environment to a remote production server or public repository. However, completing a seemingly simple merge can quickly become a chore if issues arise.
Merging is essential to every developer's workflow in Git. Without merging, your codebase would wither as contributors come up empty-handed when it comes time to mix their work in with what has already been published. Merging makes this all possible [https://blog.mergify.com/a-merge-queue-on-steroids/]. But merging can also make
A Git fast forward is an extremely useful and efficient mechanism for harmonizing your project's main branch with changes introduced in a given feature branch. Git makes ample use of fast-forwarding merges behind the scenes, speeding up your development workflow in the process. Fast-forward merges can help keep your commit
GitHub makes collaborating with many different people on a single piece of code or software much easier by managing the details involved in version control alongside your project's evolving history. This makes it especially useful for comparing code changes as they come in and sorting out differences between code submissions
Adopting the right code review best practices can drastically speed up your review process while also improving the quality of your reviews. Often enough, code reviews can become areas of contention among members of your team, prompting them to become defensive about work they’ve done or changes they may
A fundamental aspect of working on open-source projects is separating bug fixes, feature developments, and similar tasks into separate branches. Doing so lets developers experiment with code solutions free of the worry of messing things up in the main repository. However, these offshoot branches must be merged into the main